Learn the difference between QR codes and traditional asset tags for inventory tracking. Compare pros, cons, and use cases to choose the right method for your business.
Inventory accuracy directly impacts operations, customer service, and compliance. Errors lead to lost items, delays, and failed audits all of which cost time and money.
Two common tracking methods are QR codes and traditional asset tags (like barcodes or serial numbers). Both are effective, but they serve different needs depending on your systems, workflows, and compliance requirements.
This guide compares QR codes and asset tags based on accuracy, usability, scalability, and compliance, so you can choose what fits your business best; whether you're managing tools, equipment, or inventory at scale.
QR (Quick Response) codes are two-dimensional barcodes that store more information than traditional 1D barcodes. They can hold asset IDs, location data, timestamps, URLs, or other metadata. QR codes can be scanned using smartphones, tablets, or QR scanners, making them ideal for mobile teams and cloud-based systems.
Common uses:
Example: A field technician scans a QR code on a power drill with their phone to log maintenance, view usage history, and mark the item as checked out.
Traditional asset tags usually feature a 1D barcode or a serial number printed on a label or plate. These tags link to records in an internal system and require a barcode scanner or compatible software to read. They're widely used in environments where assets are stable and processes are well-established.
Common uses:
Example: During an annual audit, a company uses barcode scanners to confirm the location and status of all laptops by scanning asset tags and reconciling them against the internal asset register.
What is asset tags and why you need them?RFID (Radio-Frequency Identification) and NFC (Near Field Communication) are advanced tagging methods that don’t require direct line-of-sight scanning. They’re used in high-volume or automated environments where hands-free tracking is needed — such as large warehouses, hospitals, or industrial supply chains.
While powerful, RFID/NFC systems are more expensive to implement and are not always necessary for most small or mid-sized businesses. In this guide, we’ll focus on QR codes and traditional asset tags, as they remain the most accessible and widely adopted tracking methods today.
Traditional asset tags vs RFIDChoosing between QR codes and traditional asset tags starts with understanding their strengths and trade-offs. Below is a breakdown to help you see how each method fits into real-world inventory environments, especially when it comes to usability, accuracy, scalability, and long-term value.
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
To help you quickly assess which method fits your business, here’s a side-by-side look at how QR codes and traditional asset tags perform across key criteria.
Feature | QR Codes | Traditional Asset Tags |
---|---|---|
Ease of Use | Scannable with smartphones or tablets | Simple to apply and scan with a basic barcode reader |
Data Capacity | High – can store links, metadata, timestamps | Low – usually limited to an ID or serial number |
Accuracy | High, especially when integrated with live systems | Depends on manual processes; more prone to user error |
Durability | Good with proper materials, but can wear or smudge | Excellent – metal or engraved tags last longer in harsh environments |
Setup Requirements | Requires generating QR codes, assigning to assets, and training | Minimal – print or engrave tags and log them in a system |
Scalability | Scales well with cloud-based tools and mobile workflows | Becomes harder to manage as inventory volume increases |
Real-Time Updates | Yes – supports live syncing and audit trails | No – updates often happen in batches or during audits |
Tech Requirements | Needs mobile devices and an inventory system (e.g. AssetLoom) | Works with spreadsheets or standalone scanners |
Best Use Case | Mobile assets, growing teams, dynamic workflows | Fixed assets, small-scale or low-tech environments |
Before picking between QR codes or traditional asset tags, take a step back and look at how your business actually works. The right choice starts with understanding your assets, people, and goals.
Here’s a step by step guide to help you clarify what you need and avoid choosing a system that doesn’t fit.
Advice: Use QR codes for mobile or rotating assets that need regular updates. Use traditional tags for long term, fixed equipment that rarely moves.
Advice: Use QR codes for multi-location or fast-moving environments. Use engraved or metal tags in harsh conditions where printed codes may wear down.
Advice: If your team already uses mobile devices, QR codes can streamline tracking. If your team prefers manual systems or has no mobile access, traditional tags may be simpler.
Advice: Use QR codes if you want to store or link extra information to each item. Use basic tags if all you need is a unique ID for inventory or auditing.
Advice: Use QR codes if you're thinking about scaling, automating, or integrating. Traditional tags can still work if you expect things to stay simple and local.
Advice: Traditional tags are fast and low-cost to implement. QR codes may require more setup, but they offer better long-term efficiency if paired with the right system.
Some businesses do both and that’s perfectly fine.
If your inventory system supports both (like AssetLoom), you don’t have to choose one over the other.
Choosing the right tracking method isn’t just about technology; it’s about how your team works, how your assets move, and what kind of control you need.
Start simple:
Whether you go with QR codes, traditional asset tags, or a mix of both, the goal is the same: more accurate inventory with less friction.
And if you’re using a system like AssetLoom, you can use both methods side by side tracking what you need, the way that works best for your team.
IT Inventory Management
ITAM in General
ITAM in General
Receive the latest news from AssetLoom. right in your inbox